No second charge while unsure
If we can’t tell whether a payment went through, we wait for the payment provider to confirm. We don’t send a second charge for the same payment.
Trust
Draft · not in forceA proposed promise: if PerionPayments causes a customer to be charged twice for one payment, we put it right. It’s a draft and isn’t in force yet.
What the draft says
If we can’t tell whether a payment went through, we wait for the payment provider to confirm. We don’t send a second charge for the same payment.
Both charges must be confirmed by payment provider or bank records, and the duplicate must be shown to be caused by PerionPayments.
The proposed remedy is to reverse the duplicate amount and cover the duplicate-processing fees the records show.
What applies today: until this warranty is approved, your signed merchant agreement decides any remedy. Worried about a payment right now? Get payment help.
Once payment provider or bank records confirm both charges, and the duplicate is shown to be caused by the PerionPayments platform, the proposed remedy is to reverse the duplicate amount and cover the duplicate-processing fees those records show. Timing, exclusions, the claim window and the governing terms still need legal sign-off.
We still look into these cases, but don’t treat them as a PerionPayments duplicate from the start: a customer paying twice themselves, a second payment created by the merchant, a duplicate made only on the provider’s side outside PerionPayments’ records, or an unverified screenshot of a statement.
Draft, not a contractual offer. It doesn’t create a guarantee, a claim window or fee compensation today.